"O mankind! WE created you from a male and a female and made you into nations and tribes that you may know and honor each other (not that you should despise one another). Indeed the most honorable of you in the sight of God is the most righteous."                     

Glorious Qur'an: Chapter 49-Verse 13.

Monday, August 8

A research done by Brown University about War on Terror & its after affects

(Researched by Brown University)
Estimated cost of post-9/11 wars: 225,000 lives, up to $4 trillion
Read it here http://news.brown.edu/pressreleases/2011/06/warcostsThe cost of wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan are estimated at 225,000 lives and up to $4 trillion in U.S. spending, in a new report by scholars with the Eisenhower Research Project at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International Studies. The group’s “Costs of War” project has released new figures for a range of human and economic costs associated with the U.S. military response to the 9/11 attacks.
PROVIDENCE, R.I.*[Brown University] — Nearly 10 years after the declaration of the War on Terror, the wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan have killed at least 225,000 people, including men and women in uniform, contractors, and civilians. The wars will cost Americans between $3.2 and $4 trillion, including medical care and disability for current and future war veterans, according to a new report by the Eisenhower Research Project based at Brown University’s Watson Institute for International Studies. If the wars continue, they are on track to require at least another $450 billion in Pentagon spending by 2020.

The group’s “
Costs of War” project, which involved more than 20 economists, anthropologists, lawyers, humanitarian personnel, and political scientists, provides new estimates of the total war cost as well as other direct and indirect human and economic costs of the U.S. military response to the 9/11 attacks. The project is the first comprehensive analysis of all U.S., coalition, and civilian casualties, including U.S. contractors. It also assesses many of the wars’ hidden costs, such as interest on war-related debt and veterans’ benefits.Catherine Lutz, the Thomas J. Watson Jr. Family Professor of Anthropology and International Studies at Brown University, co-directs the Eisenhower Research Project with Neta Crawford, a 1985 Brown graduate and professor of political science at Boston University.Among the group’s main findings:
  • The U.S. wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan will cost between $3.2 and $4 trillion, including medical care and disability for current and future war veterans. This figure does not include substantial probable future interest on war-related debt.
  • More than 31,000 people in uniform and military contractors have died, including the Iraqi and Afghan security forces and other military forces allied with the United States.
  • By a very conservative estimate, 137,000 civilians have been killed in Iraq and Afghanistan by all parties to these conflicts.
  • The wars have created more than 7.8 million refugees among Iraqis, Afghans, and Pakistanis.
  • Pentagon bills account for half of the budgetary costs incurred and are a fraction of the full economic cost of the wars.
  • Because the war has been financed almost entirely by borrowing, $185 billion in interest has already been paid on war spending, and another $1 trillion could accrue in interest alone through 2020.
  • Federal obligations to care for past and future veterans of these wars will likely total between $600-$950 billion. This number is not included in most analyses of the costs of war and will not peak until mid-century.
Human costs
An Afghan resident, wounded by an insurgent grenade, receives medical treatment from a U.S. Navy corpsman near Kalach in the Oruzgan district of Afghanistan.*Credit: U.S. Army photo by Pfc. Simon Lee/Released
“This project’s accounting is important because information is vital for the public’s democratic deliberation on questions of foreign policy,” said Lutz. “Knowing the actual costs of war is essential as the public, Congress and the President weigh the drawdown of troops in Afghanistan, and other areas including the deficit, security, public investments, and reconstruction.”

“There are many costs and consequences of war that cannot be quantified, and the consequences of wars don’t end when the fighting stops,” Crawford said. “The Eisenhower study group has made a start at counting and estimating the costs in blood, treasure, and lost opportunities that are both immediately visible and those which are less visible and likely to grow even when the fighting winds down.”
The Eisenhower Research Project is a new, nonpartisan, nonprofit, scholarly initiative that derives its purpose from President Eisenhower’s 1961 farewell address, in which he warned of the “unwarranted influence” of the military-industrial complex and appealed for an “alert and knowledgeable citizenry” as the only force able to balance the often contrasting demands of security and liberty in the democratic state.

My view on Mass Media & Middle east aggression plan of Zionists.

http://www.omanforum.com/forums/showthread.php?33825-Did-you-know-this-about-Libya&p=443302#post443302


Note: This post of mine was posted in Oman Forum as per the link given above.


For those who blatantly gulp the 'vomits' of reputed media:

It is high time for the The international community for universal humanity to think, after all these killings & mass murders, what did they (the pretentious international policemen states) gain...??? Is the world any better...??? except for the fact that 'they' spilled TONS of innocent blood. (Not to mention the huge amount of WMDs & nuclear weaponry they seized from these counries). WTF fellas.

Yeah... forgot to mention... they did kill Osama (or atlest claimed to be) & fed his body to the poor fishes underwater.*
But the ultimate quest for a 'New World Order' with power & money remains where it had started in the first place. Good luck boys... Keep up the good work. Keep-on murdering & conquering more & more in the coming years... with the justification of providing justice & balance (obviously only to those countries where 'they' have hidden interests).

Ohh...yeah... BTW... ofcourse the world became better for George W Bush & Dick Cheney - former director of CIA & owners of Oil (& Construction) companies like "Zapata Corporation /*Harbinger Group Inc."


You see. That is what your problem is. If the blood being spilled is Muslim blood then you really don't give a damn & all you care is to desperately trying to defend (justify) these acts / aggression.*

So according to you if Muslims are killing other Muslims, will it justify the act of 'killing/spilling blood'. What about the right to breath & live for them...??? Is it a so least valuable thing for 'these' muslims (in your words) to be granted since they are being killed by the 'other' muslims.?
What happened to the Dark Angel I knew (the 21st century messiah) blaspheming about humanitarian rights.

I don't think thats the right way to think & take sides on. Whoever it may be irrespective of their religion, violence should be condemned (may it be by the government or any lunatic religious organization or by an extremist individual as what happened in Norway or the mass murders happened in Sri Lanka & Tibet).
With your permission, let me quote you a very famous ' vernacular saying' from my region. In today's world, even if someone slap his/her own mother, there'll be two group of people... one to oppose & the other to suppot & justify the slapper.

And BTW... these words like 'collateral damage' & 'friendly-fire incidents' are hard to digest for ordinary people like myself... And they are too fancy & convenient words for those western mass media to minimalize the impact of a disastrous incident. So try not to use it as much as you can since it always indicates to the result of a bad happening.

Wow... what a fantastic (out of the world) statement you brought out here.*Muslims*have killed*more Muslims*during those conquests done by your 'so called' American Government. Seriously dude. Do't make me laugh like this. I think you really need to take your 'pills'.*
You always talk about 'backing' self-statements with supporting docs. What about that rule of yours with your statement while I didn't put here my own opinion but a research done by a University.*

Who (may it be a company/individual) might have benefitted the most from all these attacks. May it be the construction Contracts, Weaponry business (selling to both the parties), Oil sector, Food & Medicine supply companies etc. And guess what... They couldn't find any Weapons of Mass Destruction & Nuclear weaponry nor the proof that Iraq had funded the september 11 attack by helping Al-Qaeida.*
What about the other side of the story. See how the media had 'fooled' the billions around the globe blindly lying about Weapons of Mass Destruction, Iraq's links to Al-Qaeida & Saddam's threat to the world blah blah blah.*(Now you may simply call it a conspiracy theory since you 'maynot' have heard this on BBC & CNN... )